In a complex service-provider business, service planning typically involves different tools and processes in different departments, each with its own focus and operational imperatives which may diverge from the priorities of a coordinated planning process.  Revenue opportunities may slip through a web of non-meshed plans.
				
				
    Spreadsheet models are often developed on an ad-hoc basis, and may only consider
    a single service or technology. Interaction with colleagues then requires
    extensive explanation of the detailed cell-wise logic created by the original modeller.
    In contrast, STEM’s visual medium and common business-modelling language is widely
    accepted and can facilitate a joined-up planning process which properly informs
    the business of the strategic impact of new service offerings.
    STEM brings together disciplines across the enterprise
    An incumbent operator’s planning process for new services typically constitutes
    a long chain of discussion and analysis between numerous distinct team functions
    across several different departments, as illustrated below. New business plans
    arise from separate models of market opportunity, network costs and service profitability.
    
    Service planning process
    The revenue potential of new services are compared with the cost of rolling out
    the required network infrastructure. This economic analysis is of central
    importance for the operator’s overall business development strategy. However,
    inter-departmental interaction is quite focused around separate model interfaces,
    so structural revisions to a service definition may take many months to iterate
    through this process.
    From initial assessment of the business case through to detailed profitability analysis,
    STEM is a highly effective medium for visualising the service and network structure,
    and for creating an end-to-end model (market/customer/service/network/support) which
    can evaluate the financial performance of a given service structure and associated
    growth assumptions. By providing a common language for network economics,
    STEM facilitates a much better common understanding of cost dynamics, faster iteration
    through service profile refinements and more agile response to market opportunity.
    
        
            | 
                Department
             | 
            
                Topic
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Marketing
             | 
            
                    Demand forecast 
                    Churn and substitution effects 
                    Service tariffs
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Product
             | 
            
                
                    Package composition 
                    Service revenues
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Network
             | 
            
                                    Technical solution 
                    Network design 
                    Roll-out and operating costs
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Finance
             | 
            
                
                    Overhead costs 
                    Service profitability
             | 
        
    
    Business modelling topics by department
    As an example of this process in action, one incumbent operator used STEM to analyse
    an IP satellite offering for consumers and businesses in rural areas. As soon
    as the market opportunity was identified and the initial technical proposal was
    floated, an outline model was quickly created to capture the costs of the principal
    network elements and evaluate the business case according to the proposed tariffs
    and likely service uptake. This activity created a picture of the proposed
    business structure which could be understood by all interested departments and enabled
    a rapid financial analysis of various options for the transponders and terminals.
    Based on the initial positive findings, the service description was further developed
    towards final, market-facing product packaging, the STEM model being refined at
    all steps to calculate forecast payback and service profitability, to influence
    the final go/no-go decision. In this case the conclusion was positive and
    the service is now operating successfully.
    Helping the organisation work together
    A conventional STEM licence authorises use of the software just on a user’s desktop.
    A premium distributable STEM (D-STEM) licence option grants the right to distribute
    working ‘run-time’ models to third parties. Such a run-time model has a fixed structure
    and may be run on an unlimited basis with varying input assumptions. This D-STEM
    concept addresses a growing demand for model deliverables, and allows marketing,
    pricing and technical teams to run their own sensitivities through a common business
    model.
    An alternative approach to this distribution of software is to provide Web-browser
    access to models, avoiding the need for end-users to install or learn new software.
    A link in an email can click directly to a customised presentation of key input
    parameters (‘levers’) and any combination of dynamically-updated results in a single
    Web screen, based on ‘eSTEM’ component technology. This approach can be exploited
    as an internal distribution mechanism (via the company’s intranet), as well as a
    platform for equipment vendors’ Web-based marketing via the Internet.
    
        
    Enterprise STEM configuration based on eSTEM component technology
    Eliminating road blocks in the feedback process may enable a response now rather
    than the next time someone perceives that they have time. Increased group
    participation will lead to more comprehensive, suitably informed refinement of product
    definitions.
    These D-STEM and eSTEM technologies enable a joined-up process with wider awareness
    of business model structure and underlying assumptions. The immediate peer and management
    review of input sensitivities and business model dynamics will increase buy-in to
    the modelling process, greater confidence in its results and subsequent acceptance
    of its conclusions.
    The planner’s dilemma
    With the reduced headcount and hectic schedules of today’s cost-conscious operators,
    it is hard to gain organisation-wide attention for the kind of initiative outlined
    above. A type of planner’s dilemma exists: the benefits that could
    come from a coordinated strategy are rarely achieved because it has always been
    easier to build isolated, bespoke models in small teams, than to risk the initiative
    being de-railed by unmatched effort or commitment from other departments.
    However, with the right executive stewardship, there is a real opportunity to get
    internal departments working together on a common economic vision for the company,
    an approach that is patently better for overall performance and rewards than each
    department working just to optimise its own scorecard. STEM offers a framework which
    can be understood and accepted by all those involved in the planning process.